Dacia Logan 2016 vs Citroen C-Elysee 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 9 HP less power than Citroen C-Elysee, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Citroen C-Elysee. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 3.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.2 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1310 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 1190 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C-Elysee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Elysee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | no data | |
| Dacia Logan has 4 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`090 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Citroen C-Elysee has
| |