Dacia Logan 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 88 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Volvo S60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Logan is 28 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | 1749 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 130 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 492 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Dacia Logan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |