Dacia Logan 2016 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 95 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1380 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Passat CC engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Logan 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Dacia Logan has 22 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Logan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Passat CC, so Dacia Logan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |