Dacia Logan 2016 vs Mazda 3 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 97 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 90 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.2 | |
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1130 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Ground clearance: | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mazda 3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.45 m | |
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 24 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 419 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | no data | |
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 91 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`815 | |
Safety: | |||
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7000 | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |