Dacia Logan 2016 vs Fiat Tipo 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 45 HP less power than Fiat Tipo, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Fiat Tipo. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Logan is 2 cm shorter than the Fiat Tipo, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 70 litres more trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. The Fiat Tipo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`795 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Tipo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Fiat Tipo, so Fiat Tipo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |