Dacia Logan 2016 vs Citroen C-Elysee 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 97 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 41 HP less power than Citroen C-Elysee, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Citroen C-Elysee. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen C4, Peugeot 301, Peugeot 408 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C-Elysee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C-Elysee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Elysee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1257 litres | no data | |
| Dacia Logan has 4 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`091 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Citroen C-Elysee has
| |