Dacia Logan 2012 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Logan is 28 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1749 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 130 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 499 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Dacia Logan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |