Dacia Logan 2012 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 80 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Passat CC engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Dacia Logan has 22 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Logan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Passat CC, so Dacia Logan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |