Dacia Logan 2012 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan 2012 is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan 2012 and Dacia Logan 2008 have the same engine power, but Dacia Logan 2012 torque is 21 NM more than Dacia Logan 2008. Dacia Logan 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan 2012 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2008, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan 2012 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1280 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan 2012 is 6 cm longer than the Dacia Logan 2008, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan 2012 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Dacia Logan 2008. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`059 kg | 1`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 531 kg | 465 kg | |
| Dacia Logan 2012 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Dacia Logan 2008. Therefore, Dacia Logan 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |