Dacia Logan 2012 vs Citroen C-Elysee 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen C-Elysee is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 17 HP less power than Citroen C-Elysee, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Citroen C-Elysee. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C-Elysee is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Logan consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C-Elysee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 8 cm shorter than the Citroen C-Elysee, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Dacia Logan has 4 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen C-Elysee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`590 | 1`548 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Citroen C-Elysee has
| |