Dacia Logan 2012 vs Toyota Corolla 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 47 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.3 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Used also on Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Corolla engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2013 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest.
The timing chain has a ... More about Toyota Corolla 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 452 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 58 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`562 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |