Dacia Logan 2012 vs Peugeot 301 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 301 is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 40 HP less power than Peugeot 301, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Peugeot 301. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 6.5 | |
|
The Peugeot 301 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 301 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Citroen C4, Citroen C-Elysee, Peugeot 408 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 301 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but higher. Dacia Logan is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 301, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1332 litres | |
| Dacia Logan has 4 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 301. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 301 (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`562 | 1`524 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |