Dacia Logan 2012 vs Dacia Logan 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 97 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan 2012 and Dacia Logan 2016 have the same engine power, but Dacia Logan 2012 torque is 7 NM more than Dacia Logan 2016. Dacia Logan 2012 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.0 | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan 2012 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2016, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan 2012 could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan 2016 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Logan 2012 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Logan 2012 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Micra, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan 2012 and Dacia Logan 2016 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1257 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`562 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |