Dacia Logan 2012 vs Chevrolet Cruze 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 104 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Cruze is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 34 HP less power than Chevrolet Cruze, whereas torque is 46 NM less than Chevrolet Cruze. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.3 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Logan consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Cruze, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Chevrolet Cruze gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Logan is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Cruze, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Cruze. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`562 | 1`813 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Chevrolet Cruze has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Chevrolet Cruze, so Chevrolet Cruze quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Chevrolet Cruze has
| |