Dacia Logan 2012 vs Hyundai i30 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Dacia Logan engine produces 19 HP less power than Hyundai i30, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Hyundai i30. Despite less power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30, which means that by driving the Dacia Logan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Captur, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Hyundai i20 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 7 cm longer than the Hyundai i30, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Logan is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1250 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 170 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai i30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai i30, which means Dacia Logan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Hyundai i30 has
| |