Dacia Logan 2008 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is larger. Dacia Logan is 48 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 10 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Dacia Logan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Dacia Logan, so Dacia Logan quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Renault Clio has
| |