Dacia Logan 2008 vs Dacia Sandero 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Logan engine produces 15 HP more power than Dacia Sandero, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Dacia Sandero. Thanks to more power Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Sandero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Logan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Sandero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 27 cm longer than the Dacia Sandero, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Dacia Logan has 190 litres more trunk space than the Dacia Sandero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Sandero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Dacia Sandero, so Dacia Sandero quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Sandero has
| |