Dacia Logan 2008 vs Skoda Rapid 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Rapid is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 20 HP less power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Skoda Rapid. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Rapid gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Rapid, 3 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1490 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Rapid may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.4 metres less than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Dacia Logan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`699 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`075 kg | 1`244 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 455 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Rapid has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 535 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Skoda Rapid has
| |