Dacia Logan 2008 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 201 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan 2012 is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan 2008 and Dacia Logan 2012 have the same engine power, but Dacia Logan 2008 torque is 21 NM less than Dacia Logan 2012. Dacia Logan 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan 2012 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Logan 2008 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan 2008 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Logan 2008 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan 2012. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan 2012 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Nissan Note | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan 2012 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Logan 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Dacia Logan 2008 is 6 cm shorter than the Dacia Logan 2012, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan 2008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan 2012. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`075 kg | 1`059 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 531 kg | |
| Dacia Logan 2008 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Dacia Logan 2012. Therefore, Dacia Logan 2012 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |