Dacia Logan 2005 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Logan engine produces 23 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Dacia Logan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dacia Logan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Logan could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Logan consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Renault Kangoo | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Star | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Lancer engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.45 m | |
| Dacia Logan is 23 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
510 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Logan has 80 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.6/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |