Dacia Logan 2008 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Dacia Logan is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Renault Clio has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.1 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 105 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 107 - 200 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 15 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 7.1 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Dacia Logan petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Dacia Logan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Dacia Logan is larger. Dacia Logan is 48 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 10 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Logan is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 510 litres | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Logan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Logan has
|
Renault Clio has
| |