Dacia Lodgy 2017 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Dacia Lodgy is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Lodgy engine produces 11 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Dacia Lodgy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.3 | |
| Dacia Lodgy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that by driving the Dacia Lodgy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Lodgy 2017 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
| Dacia Lodgy is 7 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Lodgy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 207 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 207 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 827 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2617 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Dacia Lodgy has more luggage space (by 290 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Lodgy is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Lodgy has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Lodgy has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |