Dacia Lodgy 2012 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Lodgy engine produces 60 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Due to the lower power, Dacia Lodgy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.2 | |
|
The Dacia Lodgy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Lodgy consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Dacia Lodgy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Dacia Lodgy is smaller. Dacia Lodgy is 32 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Lodgy is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 827 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 827 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Dacia Lodgy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 190 percent more cases than Dacia Lodgy, so Dacia Lodgy quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Lodgy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |