Dacia Lodgy 2012 vs BMW 2 series 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Lodgy engine produces 60 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Dacia Lodgy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Lodgy is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Lodgy consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Lodgy could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Lodgy consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used also on BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 2 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Lodgy 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Lodgy 2012 1.5 engine BMW 2 sērija 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with long life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine is in need of good ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.56 m | |
| Dacia Lodgy is 16 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Lodgy is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 827 litres | 468 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 827 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 468 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1905 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Lodgy is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 2 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 2 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| BMW 2 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Lodgy has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than BMW 2 series, so BMW 2 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Lodgy has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |