Dacia Lodgy 2012 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 - 115 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 - 240 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.5 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.1 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Dacia Lodgy petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Dacia Lodgy equipped with diesel engines consume 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Dacia Lodgy is smaller. Dacia Lodgy is 32 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Lodgy is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 827 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Dacia Lodgy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Lodgy has 437 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Lodgy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Dacia Lodgy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`862 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Lodgy has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |