Dacia Duster 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 85 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 172 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Duster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller. Dacia Duster is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Duster is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | 1790 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`838 kg | 2`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`288 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 490 kg | |
| Dacia Duster load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Therefore, Dacia Duster is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 12 400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |