Dacia Duster 2010 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 85 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 172 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 5.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller. Dacia Duster is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Duster is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`838 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 14 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |