Dacia Duster 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 65 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 199 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller. Dacia Duster is 5 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Dacia Duster has 102 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`838 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |