Dacia Duster 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 86 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is larger. Dacia Duster is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Duster is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1604 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Dacia Duster has 56 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 385 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX scores higher in safety tests. The Mitsubishi ASX scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |