Dacia Duster 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 LPG | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Duster consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2006: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
| Dacia Duster is 21 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Duster is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1604 litres | 1532 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`710 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`160 kg | 1`498 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 550 kg | 552 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 4600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |