Dacia Duster 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Dacia Duster) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 26 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 15 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Duster consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Duster gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
| Dacia Duster is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Duster is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Duster has 68 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.9 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`801 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |