Dacia Duster 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 60 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller, but higher. Dacia Duster is 1 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Duster is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Dacia Duster has 105 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 1.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`801 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |