Dacia Duster 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 150 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 300 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.2 | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Duster consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 212 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Jaguar E-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller, but higher. Dacia Duster is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Duster is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Dacia Duster has 146 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 95 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 1.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`801 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |