Dacia Duster 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 60 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Duster consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Duster 2017 1.5 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller, but slightly higher. Dacia Duster is 3 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Duster is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Dacia Duster has 130 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 1.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`801 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |