Dacia Duster 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Duster could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.56 m | |
| Dacia Duster is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Duster is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1444 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Duster has 68 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`809 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |