Dacia Duster 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Dacia Duster over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is smaller, but higher. Dacia Duster is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Dacia Duster is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 445 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1444 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Duster has 61 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 238 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Dacia Duster can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`809 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |