Dacia Duster 2013 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Duster engine produces 30 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 119 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Due to the lower power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Duster could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Duster consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki SX4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Suzuki SX4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is larger. Dacia Duster is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki SX4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Duster is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1636 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Dacia Duster has 43 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 367 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Suzuki SX4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Suzuki SX4, so Suzuki SX4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |