Dacia Duster 2013 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Dacia Duster engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Ford EcoSport. Despite less power, Dacia Duster reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dacia Duster consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Duster could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Duster consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford EcoSport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Duster can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Duster version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Dacia Duster 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Duster 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Dacia Duster is larger, but slightly lower. Dacia Duster is 4 cm longer than the Ford EcoSport, 6 cm wider, while the height of Dacia Duster is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1636 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage capacity. Dacia Duster has 140 litres more trunk space than the Ford EcoSport. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 398 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Duster is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Ford EcoSport, so Ford EcoSport quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Duster has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |