Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Dacia Dokker is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Dokker engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 20 NM more than Ford C-Max. Despite less power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford EcoSport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but higher. Dacia Dokker is 2 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Dokker has 368 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1316 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`826 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |