Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Dacia Dokker is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Dokker engine produces 17 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Dacia Dokker can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Dacia Dokker version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller. Dacia Dokker is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 3100 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3000 litres | 3100 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Dacia Dokker has 2300 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`956 kg | 2`150 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`308 kg | 1`404 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 648 kg | 746 kg | |
| Dacia Dokker load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Volkswagen Caddy. Therefore, Volkswagen Caddy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |