Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Dacia Dokker is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Dokker engine produces 6 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller. Dacia Dokker is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 3200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Dokker has 610 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 2`068 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |