Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 31 HP less power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Toyota Verso. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter Toyota 1AD-FTV diesel engine, also known as the 2.0 D-4D, was produced from 2005 to 2018. In 2009, with the shift to Euro 5 emission standards, the engine was updated with piezo injectors replacing the earlier electromagnetic ones. It features an IHI RHF4 ... More about Toyota Verso 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but higher. Dacia Dokker is 10 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3000 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1260 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Dacia Dokker can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`899 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |