Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 86 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Dacia Dokker is more dynamic to drive. Dacia Dokker engine produces 9 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.21 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
Dacia Dokker is 15 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 660 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 2600 litres | |
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Dacia Dokker has 140 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 400 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Dacia Dokker can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`899 | 1`954 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Dacia Dokker has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Dacia Dokker, so Dacia Dokker quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7000 | 9400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |