Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2016
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 65 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Dacia Dokker consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Espace | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Renault Grand Scenic engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.66 m | |
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but higher. Dacia Dokker is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Grand Scenic, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 15 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 533 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 533 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 800 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1737 litres | |
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1263 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`899 | 2`340 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 11 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |