Dacia Dokker 2016 vs BMW 2 series 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 21 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 50 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 2 series is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.56 m | |
| Dacia Dokker and BMW 2 series are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 645 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3000 litres | 1905 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Dacia Dokker has 155 litres more trunk space than the BMW 2 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means Dacia Dokker can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`899 kg | 2`155 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`368 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 531 kg | 655 kg | |
| Dacia Dokker load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than BMW 2 series. Therefore, BMW 2 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW 2 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than BMW 2 series, so BMW 2 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |