Dacia Dokker 2016 vs BMW 2 series 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 2 series is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 55 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 110 NM less than BMW 2 series. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Used also on BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW 2 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Dacia Dokker 2016 1.5 engine BMW 2 sērija 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with long life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine is in need of good ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.56 m | |
| Dacia Dokker is 2 cm longer than the BMW 2 series, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 468 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1905 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Dacia Dokker has 332 litres more trunk space than the BMW 2 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`899 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| BMW 2 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than BMW 2 series, so BMW 2 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |