Dacia Dokker 2016 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 LPG | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 10 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but higher. Dacia Dokker is 8 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Dokker has 263 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`826 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |