Dacia Dokker 2013 vs Renault Kangoo 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 134 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.3 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 17 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Dacia Dokker consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Dacia Dokker is 15 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 660 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3000 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Dacia Dokker has 140 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Dacia Dokker can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`768 kg | 1`924 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`090 kg | 1`320 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 678 kg | 604 kg | |
| Dacia Dokker load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Renault Kangoo. Therefore, Dacia Dokker is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Dokker has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Dacia Dokker quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |