Dacia Dokker 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 5.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
890 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Volkswagen Touran engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.81 m | 1.67 m | |
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but higher. Dacia Dokker is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | 1989 litres | |
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Dokker has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The Volkswagen Touran may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 1011 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 2`190 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |