Dacia Dokker 2013 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 50 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Dokker is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Dacia Dokker over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Dacia Dokker consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Dokker gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine Volkswagen Caddy 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller. Dacia Dokker is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3000 litres | 3200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 200 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`854 kg | 2`194 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`205 kg | 1`469 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 649 kg | 725 kg | |
| Dacia Dokker load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Volkswagen Caddy. Therefore, Volkswagen Caddy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |