Dacia Dokker 2013 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso is a more dynamic driving. Dacia Dokker engine produces 22 HP less power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Citroen C4 Picasso. Due to the lower power, Dacia Dokker reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Dacia Dokker consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Dacia Dokker could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Dacia Dokker consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C4 Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Dacia Dokker 2013 1.5 engine Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Dacia Dokker is smaller, but higher. Dacia Dokker is 8 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Dacia Dokker is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 800 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3000 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Dacia Dokker has 263 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Dacia Dokker is 0.3 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`854 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen C4 Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Dokker has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Citroen C4 Picasso, so Citroen C4 Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Dacia Dokker has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |